This report sets out our Remuneration Policy and Remuneration Implementation Report for executive directors and nonexecutive directors’ remuneration for the 2023 financial year and is presented in three parts:
| i) | Part 1: The background statement which provides context to our Remuneration Policy and performance; |
| ii) | Part 2: An overview of the forward-looking Remuneration Policy applicable in the 2024 financial year; and |
| iii) | Part 3: The Remuneration Implementation Report which sets out in detail how the existing policy was implemented during the year under review, including disclosure on payments made to executive directors and non-executive directors during the year ended 30 June 2023. |
Remgro’s remuneration philosophy is guided by its sustainability-focused business strategy, including ESG as a key component, the outcome of which is geared to deliver sustainable value and accretive returns for shareholders over the long term whilst simultaneously driving a positive ESG impact that unlocks shared value for all stakeholders.
Due to the nature of the business, the remuneration framework, on an organisation-wide basis, provides for fixed remuneration (i.e. salary and benefits) and a long-term share plan, which only renders value if the performance criteria linked to sustainable value and the employment condition are met. As an investment holding company, the Remuneration and Nomination Committee (the committee) views increased market capitalisation, sustainable growth in the share price and above-average dividend yield (collectively referred to as shareholder total return) as critical metrics to deliver sustainable value to shareholders over the long term. In line with this approach, Remgro does not pay short-term incentives (i.e. cash bonuses) and believes that management’s decision-making should be long-term focused. It is aligned with the philosophy that they should be rewarded where value creation is demonstrated, without excessive risk taking in the short term. This two-tier approach makes the Remgro Remuneration Policy focused and avoids unnecessary layers of complexity. Our remuneration philosophy and policy are further detailed in Part 2 of this report.
The current challenging environment that businesses are required to operate in, is widely recognised and covered regularly in the media. Remgro and its investee companies, like all other South African businesses, are expected to successfully and sustainably operate under tough and challenging conditions such as ongoing load shedding, high inflation, high interest rates, sharp increases in electricity prices, foreign exchange volatility, ongoing geopolitical tensions, weak business confidence and unacceptable levels of crime and corruption. This becomes especially relevant as it relates to the impact on consumers and the risk of increased social instability as poverty levels rise. With low levels of expected economic growth, failing state infrastructure relating to energy, transport and logistics in particular, and the slow pace of economic reforms to date, the urgency with which these issues need to be addressed cannot be overstated.
Despite this very challenging business environment, the committee is very pleased with the Group’s performance in managing to maintain the positive earnings momentum despite all the headwinds. The committee is also pleased with the completion of both the Mediclinic Group Limited (Mediclinic) and Distell Group Holdings Limited (Distell)/Heineken International B.V. (Heineken) corporate transactions that were implemented during the year. Both of these transformative transactions have been in the making for many years, and it is satisfying to finally acknowledge their completion.
The finalisation of these transactions marks another inflection point in Remgro’s rich history – prior to implementation, approximately 70% of Remgro’s portfolio could be accessed directly via relevant issuers on various stock exchanges. The ratio between the value of the unlisted and listed portion of our portfolio has completely switched, with the value of the unlisted portion of Remgro’s portfolio now sitting at approximately 70%, materially increasing Remgro’s scarcity factor and positioning it for further growth.
During the year under review, the company made good progress in delivering our other strategic priorities. These priorities remain unchanged and focus on growing our triple bottom line sustainably by unlocking value for our shareholders, efficient capital allocation and continued focus on our sustainability drive.
Management remains committed towards unlocking further value through intensified focus on its core turnaround and growth assets and disposal of non-core assets, combined with a renewed focus on new growth opportunities. The Company also continue its sustainability drive to position Remgro as an ESG industry leader through continuous improvement in disclosure and shareholder engagement.
In line with Remgro’s philosophy on fair and responsible remuneration, the following decision was taken with regards to increases:
The vesting outcomes for the 2020 LTI awards, for which the performance period ended on 30 June 2023, were 73%. The better than target outcome, should be considered against the background of our analysis of shareholder value creation through the growth in Remgro's share price over the vesting period. The Remgro share price has grown by 50% over this period (from R98/share to R147/share) which approximates a 14.25% annualised return. When adding the Remgro dividend payments (which ranges between 1.25% to 1.5% per annum over the vesting period) to the growth in share price, this provides for an annualised total shareholder return in excess of 15.5%. The committee is therefore comfortable that the vesting outcome is aligned to shareholder value creation.
Details on the vesting of these awards are set out in Part 3 of this report.
Remgro aims to be the trusted investment company of choice that consistently creates sustainable stakeholder value to deliver not only financial returns for shareholders, but to make a positive ESG impact that delivers shared value to all our stakeholders. While workplace, economic, social and environmental sustainability practices have always been part of Remgro’s core values and are entrenched within Remgro’s overall governance framework, Remgro aims to become an ESG leader within the South African context.
Since 2021, the Group has placed increased emphasis on ESG practices, recognising that the best way to advance our sustainability agenda is by partnering with our investee companies across their value chains to implement ESG principles and the creation of consistent standards that collectively deliver greater and more measurable impact over the long term for all our stakeholders. Within the Remgro holding company, appropriate Strategic and Operational ESG Committees and work groups were established to ensure that Remgro remains engaged with and furthers its values-driven ethos.
Remgro’s approach to ESG and sustainability is anchored in its investment stewardship role. Remgro’s responsible investment principles are at the heart of our decision-making to ensure adherence to robust principles and criteria to deliver sustainable financial returns, alongside the creation of positive, measurable ESG impact. This includes purposefully integrating impact throughout the investment lifecycle where sustainable value can be generated over the long term to improve ESG performance.
Remgro is committed to helping those companies it invests in shape their approach to ESG to ensure our investments reflect our ambition to create environmental, social and economic change throughout our ecosystem. Governance and climate risk mitigation practices have been embedded into Remgro’s value chain activities across the Group and its investee companies’ ecosystem to drive progress.
The first Remgro LTI awards with the ESG measures were awarded in 2020 (being the 2019 and 2020 LTI awards). To further incentivise and motivate management in driving this journey, qualitative ESG measures were incorporated into the Remgro LTI awards in 2021 and 2022, which measures detailed strategic milestones to be achieved by specified dates. By incorporating specific ESG measures into the LTI, Remgro is illustrating its public commitment to ESG. An overview of the specified areas of focus, covered by the 2019 to 2022 LTI awards, are outlined below:
Area 1 – Building Remgro’s ESG foundation/platform:Referencing the 2019 and 2020 LTI awards, ESG milestones were primarily linked to Remgro’s ESG journey as an investment holding company which requires the successful delivery of:
For Remgro to achieve a stretch ESG performance outcome on its 2019 and 2020 LTI awards a secondary focus was placed that, in addition to Remgro building an ESG foundation/platform (linked to the milestones outlined above), Remgro should strive to accelerate the execution of an ESG impact within key subsidiary portfolio companies through Remgro’s strategic influence in guiding these companies to embed an ESG focus within their own remuneration policies.
Area 2 – Providing strategic guidance to deliver an ESG portfolio impact:Referencing the 2021 and 2022 LTI awards, the ESG milestones evolved and were primarily linked to Remgro delivering a portfolio impact on the following earmarked investee companies (who collectively represent circa 80% of Remgro’s INAV):
| Heineken Beverages | Mediclinic | RCL Foods | ||
| Maziv Group | Air Products | OUTsurance Group | ||
| TotalEnergies | Wispeco | Siqalo Foods | ||
The anticipated portfolio impact was linked to Remgro successfully delivering strategic influence on the following:
Taking the above criteria into consideration, Remgro’s ESG success rate for the 2021 and 2022 LTI awards were expressed as a governance/influence factor measured with reference to how many earmarked investment companies they successfully strategically influenced referencing the above specified criteria.
It is the committee’s view that the specific qualitative targets were suitably challenging, aligned with the Company’s strategy and laid a solid foundation upon which the Company can deliver on its ESG ambition.
More details are provided in Parts 2 and 3 of this report.
At the Annual General Meeting (AGM) held on 30 November 2022, 64.91% of Remgro’s ordinary shareholders voted in favour of the Remuneration Policy, with 70.35% of ordinary shareholders voting in favour of the Remuneration Implementation Report. In light of the fact that more than 25% of ordinary shareholders voted against the Remuneration Policy and the Remuneration Implementation Report, and in compliance with King IV and the JSE Listings Requirements, dissenting shareholders were invited to engage with the Company. Shareholders were provided further focused engagement opportunities through virtual engagement sessions during our shareholder engagement roadshows.
The specific areas of concern, together with actions taken as a result of the issues raised, are listed in more detail below.
Shareholder concern |
Action taken/Remgro’s response |
||||||
|
Remuneration Policy Timeline as to when the quantifiable ESG metrics will be introduced |
The intention of the committee and management was to introduce quantifiable ESG metrics as soon as practically possible. For this purpose, the target and stretch measures for 2021, 2022 and beyond were not disclosed in the 2021 Remuneration Report. As a holding company Remgro is not fully aware of the ESG maturity levels at different investee companies and the baseline measures for key ESG measures at these companies. In 2022, Remgro commissioned a baseline ESG footprint report. This entailed obtaining certain qualitative and quantitative information from selected investee companies. During this process, Remgro assessed the latest leading best practice related to stewardship and has incorporated some of those principles into the baseline questionnaires and to inform target setting discussions. In 2023, the exercise was repeated to ascertain progress year on year. Feedback demonstrated good progress regarding the amount of ESG information that the investee companies are measuring and tracking. Remgro and its investee companies have implemented numerous ESG processes since the ESG baseline footprint report was first issued in June 2022 and improvements were noted in many areas. |
||||||
| Should the long-serving non-executive directors still be regarded as independent |
The committee believes on a substance over form basis that long-serving non-executive directors can still be regarded as independent. The independence of non-executive directors is reviewed annually and those independence of non-executive directors, who have served on the Board for more than nine years, is subject to a rigorous review by the Board. Furthermore, the Board, led by the Lead Independent Director, considered the independence of the independent non-executive directors, and is satisfied with the overall independence of the Board. In addition, the committee’s view is that the overriding concern should not be one of enforcing alignment or seeking independence at all costs but should be whether the governing body is knowledgeable, skilled, experienced, diverse and independent enough to discharge its roles and responsibilities fully. The committee mandated a working group consisting of two of the committee non-executive directors (NEDs) and two executive directors to develop a roadmap to refresh the Board. The principles this roadmap will be developed on, remain: suitable skills, competencies, diversity and independence. The first formal feedback to the committee will be on 4 December 2023. |
||||||
| The LTI financial performance conditions does not incorporate a sufficient element of “stretch” performance |
As a consequence of Remgro’s investment strategy, which focuses on the delivery of sustainable long-term shareholder value growth and the payment of stable dividends, Remgro designed and implemented a LTI policy which closely mimics its investment strategy. Historical INAV and free cash flow LTI performance targets were set based on the principle that incentive targets should be stretching yet realistic, given business and economic realities. Furthermore, with the aim of simplicity, a uniform set of performance targets have historically been used for both the Conditional Share Plan (CSP) awards and the Share Appreciation Right (SAR) awards, although the risk-return profile of the SAR awards only entitles the participants to unlock value associated with the growth in share price – representing a further embedded share price growth performance condition. The calibration of the historical INAV performance target references a 3-5 year longbond rate which is aligned with vesting period of the CSP and SAR awards. Stretch performance required and additional spread of 5% which approximates a standard deviation of the JSE all share and Top 40 indices (representing two alternative balanced portfolios) over a historical 15-year period. After careful deliberation and following extensive engagement with shareholders the committee agreed that the LTI financial performance conditions for the 2024 financial year (FY2024) Remuneration Policy (refer to Part 2 on page 100) should be amended with the following enhancements being proposed for awards made in FY2024 and beyond:
|
||||||
| The LTI performance conditions does not place a large enough emphasis on the closing of the share price to net asset value (P/NAV) discount. |
The committee is of the view that the historical LTI performance conditions (consisting of ESG, INAV growth and free cash flow growth) collectively drives sustainable value creation for shareholders and wider stakeholders, which endorses the right behaviours that should positively contribute to narrowing the P/NAV discount. In addition, taking cognisance of the above proposed LTI enhancements, coupled with strategic initiatives, the committee remains confident that the LTI performance conditions will collectively continue to drive the right behaviours going forward. To further drive alignment with shareholders the committee has also introduced a minimum shareholding requirement (MSR) for the CEO and CFO – set at 375% of TGP for the CEO and 200% of TGP for the CFO. The CEO and CFO will be granted a 5-year period to achieve the MSR. The committee is of the view that MSR should also positively contribute in an attempt to narrow the P/NAV discount. |
||||||
Remuneration is key in incentivising employees across all levels to work towards driving the execution of Remgro’s strategic objectives and to build a sustainable business over the long term. The committee remains committed to ongoing engagement with shareholders and welcomes any constructive feedback they may wish to provide to ensure that the Company’s approach to remuneration supports fair and responsible remuneration.
At the 2023 AGM Remgro will put its Remuneration Policy and Remuneration Implementation Report to two separate non-binding advisory shareholder votes (see Ordinary Resolutions Numbers 14 and 15 in the Notice to shareholders) and the committee looks forward to a positive outcome in this regard.
The committee’s activities for 2023 were geared towards monitoring the achievement of Remgro’s strategic objectives. In addition to the committee’s normal duties, the committee:
During the 2024 financial year the committee will focus on the following forward-looking considerations:
During the 2023 financial year, the committee has engaged two external remuneration consultants namely PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. (PwC) and REMchannel, to assist management and the Board in performing their duties and responsibilities.
The committee considered the advice, opinions and services received by PwC and REMchannel during the 2023 financial year. The committee is satisfied and regards the consultants as being wholly objective and independent.
The committee is of the view that during the 2023 financial year, Remgro’s Remuneration Policy achieved its stated objectives. Remgro constantly strives to improve the Company’s remuneration practices and we look forward to our engagement with our shareholders and receiving their support on the resolutions for both the Remuneration Policy and Remuneration Implementation Report (see Ordinary Resolutions Numbers 14 and 15 in the Notice to shareholders) at the AGM on 4 December 2023.
The Remuneration Policy provides an overview of Remgro’s remuneration principles for the organisation as a whole and applies to all permanent employees. The information provided in this policy has been approved by the Board on recommendation by the committee. This Remuneration Policy will be put to a non-binding advisory vote by shareholders at the next AGM on 4 December 2023.
The committee is appointed by the Board with delegated powers and the functioning of this dedicated Board committee is well established within Remgro’s mode of operation. In essence it is the committee’s role to ensure fair and responsible remuneration across the Company, by way of policy making and implementation, and that the disclosure of remuneration is accurate, complete and transparent. Ultimate responsibility remains with the Board.
The committee is governed by a mandate, reviewed and approved by the Board annually, that incorporates best practice governance recommendations and serves to assist members of this committee in the execution of their role and responsibilities.
The committee consists of four non-executive directors, three of whom are independent. The members of the committee for the year under review were:
The Board acknowledges the recommended practice in King IV that the Chairman of the Board should not be the chairman of this committee but given the following reasons, this arrangement is deemed appropriate:
The committee formally met twice during the year and had numerous informal interactions in preparation for the formal meetings, engagements with shareholders and pre-meetings. The details on the attendance of the formal meetings are set out in the Corporate Governance Report.
The mandate, set out in the terms of reference of the committee, includes the following:
In respect of its nomination function –
In respect of its remuneration function –
Workplace, economic, social and environmental sustainability practices have always been part of Remgro’s core values and through our new ESG strategy, these practices are entrenched within our overall remuneration framework.
Link to ESG |
Link to reward |
||||||
| Environmental | Inclusion of ESG measures within the LTI plans Individual KPIs include specific ESG measures |
||||||
| Social |
TGP of non-management employees is competitive and is positioned around the 75th percentile of the market All employees participate in the LTI plan Lower-level employees typically receive higher percentage increases |
||||||
| Governance | Balancing employee interests with that of shareholders by rewarding for the delivery of growth in INAV Alignment of executive remuneration and shareholder value creation through the adoption of minimum shareholding requirements (MSR) Aligning to international best practice by incorporating malus and clawback provisions into variable pay Clear and transparent remuneration reporting Development of an ESG governance framework |
||||||
As noted in Part 1 of this report, Remgro’s aim is to become an ESG leader and is focused on maximising its impact as an investment holding company by establishing and rolling out an ESG strategy and governance framework throughout the Group of identified investee companies. Remgro commenced its ESG journey in 2020.
In order to drive the execution of this goal and to ensure that it is sufficiently prioritised, ESG measures were introduced into the LTIs in 2021 and 2022 as a non-financial component with a weighting of 20%. The ESG measures for the 2019 and 2020 awards were qualitative measures focused on governance and risk as well as strategic investment decisions and portfolio impact and which detailed milestones to be achieved by specified dates in order to lay the foundation for the establishment and implementation of an ESG strategy throughout the Group.
Building on the foundation laid through delivery on the qualitative milestones, Remgro has introduced quantitative ESG measures, taking the form of a governance influence factor (as referenced in Part 1), into the 2021 and 2022 LTIs which measures are aimed at establishing the appropriate ESG governance structures within key investee companies.
The delivery of Remgro’s strategy is dependent on the values, talent and skills of all employees across the Company and Remgro therefore views employees as critical assets. Remgro committed to the principle of rewarding all employees across the Company in a manner which is fair and responsible and strives to create an environment which is inclusive. This commitment is entrenched in the Remuneration Policy.
The TGP of all employees is positioned around the 75th percentile of the market which takes into account that the Company does not have short-term incentives (STI) in place. For executive directors, prescribed officers and senior managers, the company targets the median of the reference group on a Total Reward (TR) comparison. All employees are furthermore eligible to receive LTI awards and not only executives. Lower-level employees typically receive higher percentage increases than other employees.
Further ongoing actions taken in this regard include:
Remgro has two components of remuneration, namely fixed remuneration (which includes benefits) and LTIs in the form of its old Remgro Equity Settled Share Appreciation Right Scheme (SAR Scheme), current Remgro Equity Settled Share Appreciation Rights Plan (SAR Plan) and Remgro Equity Settled Conditional Share Plan (CSP). Remgro does not pay short-term incentives and believes that management’s decision-making should be long-term focused and aligned with the philosophy that they should be rewarded where long-term value creation is demonstrated, without excessive risk taking in the short term.
The same remuneration principles and components apply to all employees of Remgro. The remuneration policies, principles and practices of investee companies are governed through remuneration committee structures in these organisations.
Click here for more information
Fixed remuneration |
Purpose |
|
To provide competitive fixed remuneration that will attract and retain appropriate talent. Reflects an individual’s responsibilities, experience and role. |
What does this contain? |
|
Referred to as TGP (Total Guaranteed Pay), includes components such as cash salary, travel allowance and the Company’s contributions towards retirement funding and the medical scheme. All guaranteed benefits are funded from the TGP. Retirement funding contributions range between 12.5% and 27.5% of pensionable emolument and the key features of the retirement fund are as follows:
Membership to a medical scheme is compulsory for all employees and contributions are funded from their TGP. All employees are eligible for membership of the in-house medical scheme, Remedi, and the scheme provides three different options for members to choose from annually. These options aim to accommodate the different healthcare needs and affordability of the diverse membership of the scheme. Under specific circumstances Remgro also offers employees post-employment medical benefits. All details in this regard are disclosed in the Annual Financial Statements. Only employees who are required to regularly travel for business purposes receive travel allowances, which is funded from their TGP. |
How is the TGP benchmarked? |
|
Guaranteed packages for all employees are benchmarked against the upper quartile of the market for comparable companies utilising independent salary surveys. Remgro currently makes use of the REMchannel national survey for purposes of benchmarking employees. For Management Board members and senior executives, the more focused JSE Top 40 circle provided by REMchannel is used to benchmark TGP. The TGP is positioned competitively to the market to ensure that the right talent is attracted and retained. It further supports the remuneration approach of no short-term cash bonuses and discourages excessive risk taking which may be driven by leveraged cash bonuses. |
Annual review process |
|
The committee conducts an annual review of the TGP for executives and approves the increase percentage for employees below executive level. As part of this review the committee considers the actual TGP, the LTI opportunity as well as the Total Reward outcome for all employees (including Management Board members and senior executives) against the median market benchmarked data. Adjustments to the TGP depends upon the employee’s level of responsibility and his/her overall performance. The CEO, who attends all committee meetings by invitation, may propose increases to the TGP, excluding his own, during such review meetings. |
Variable remuneration |
Share Appreciation Rights Plan |
Conditional Share Plan |
Purpose |
|
Ensures alignment between personal wealth creation and corporate strategy and supports long-term employee retention. |
How does it work? |
|
This is an equity settled plan whereby selected employees are awarded rights to receive shares equal to the long-term growth in the Remgro share price and market capitalisation of the Company. These rights are awarded free of charge. The ultimate vesting of shares will be subject to prospective performance conditions for selected participants as well as an employment condition. The participants will only become shareholders in Remgro with shareholder rights, including dividend and voting rights, on the settlement date. |
This is an equity settled plan under which all employees may be granted an award consisting of the conditional right to receive Remgro shares at a future point in time. These conditional shares are awarded free of charge. The ultimate vesting of shares will be subject to prospective performance conditions for selected participants as well as an employment condition. The participants will only become shareholders in Remgro with shareholder rights, including dividend and voting rights, on the settlement date, which will be shortly after the vesting date. |
Who qualifies to participate? |
|
The SAR Plan is currently used to incentivise executive directors and employees at senior executive level only. |
All permanent employees of the Company may participate in the CSP. |
Determination of value/allocation |
|
The committee makes annual awards in terms of the SAR Plan and the CSP to participants, based on a multiple of TGP. The set annual multiples are determined by reference to a participant’s job grade, role, the need to attract and/or retain key talent and the value added by the participant for Remgro and shareholders. The face value award multiples are as follows:
For the CEO, executive directors, other members of the Management Board (prescribed officers) and identified investment executives these multiples are split in the ratio of 25% for the SAR Plan awards and 75% for the CSP awards. These awards are subject to stretching financial Company performance conditions, ESG and strategic measures as well as individual performance conditions which focus on governance and risk including strategic investment decisions and portfolio impact. For all other participants, 100% of the award is under the CSP. The vesting of these awards is subject to continued employment only. These multiples are within current market parameters. In addition, the rules of the CSP allow for ad hoc awards to be made to participants in exceptional circumstances as determined by the committee. Refer to the Remuneration Implementation Report here for previous SARs and CSPs awarded. |
Dividend equivalents |
|
Not applicable.
|
Participants will be eligible to receive dividend equivalents on vested shares at the end of the vesting period of the award. The dividend equivalent will be rolled up over the vesting period and delivered as additional shares on the vesting date. |
Vesting and exercise/settlement |
|
Participants in the SAR Plan are remunerated with Remgro shares to the value of the appreciation of their rights to a specific number of Remgro ordinary shares. The earliest intervals at which the SARs vest and are exercisable are as follows:
All SARs must be exercised within seven years after the grant date, upon which date unexercised SARs lapse. Vesting is conditional on fulfilment of the employment period and achievement of performance conditions (where applicable). |
Awards under the CSP will vest as follows:
Vesting is conditional on fulfilment of the employment period and achievement of performance conditions (where applicable).
|
Performance conditions |
|
The SAR Plan has an embedded performance hurdle whereby participants will only benefit if there is long-term share price appreciation and thus value creation for Remgro shareholders. 2023 Award Following extensive engagement with shareholders the committee agreed that for the 2023 SAR and CSP awards, which is expected to be made in December 2023, the LTI performance criteria should be enhanced to include the following amendments:
In addition, to further drive performance the committee has also elected to split the December 2023 LTI awards in a ratio of 75% CSPs and 25% SARs, relative to the historical split of 50% CSPs and 50% SARs. An overview of the anticipated financial and non-financial performance measures for the December 2023 SAR and CSP awards are set out below: Financial scorecard – representing lagging indicators
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Performance measure |
Weight |
Threshold (vesting 30%)(1) |
On-target (vesting 50%)(1) |
Stretch (vesting 100%)(1) |
|
CSP → |
50% |
Year one Total Return plus the 3 – 5 year SA Long bond rate over three financial years |
Year one Total Return plus the 3 – 5 year SA Long bond rate plus [2% to 4%](2) over three financial years |
Year one Total Return plus the 3 – 5 year SA Long bond rate plus [6% to 8%](2) over three financial years |
|
SAR → |
Year one Total Return plus CPI over three financial years |
Year one Total Return |
Year one Total Return plus |
|
|
CSP → |
25% |
Year one FCF plus CPI over three financial years |
n/a |
Year one FCF plus CPI plus |
|
SAR → |
Year one FCF plus CPI over three financial years |
n/a |
Year one FCF plus CPI plus [1% to 1.25%](2) over three financial years |
|
Performance measure |
Weight |
Threshold (vesting 30%)(1) |
On-target (vesting 50%)(1) |
Stretch (vesting 100%)(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ESG impact(2) through influencing investee companies, ESG rating agencies and climate goals, diversity and enhanced disclosure |
15% |
Internal targets as approved by Remuneration and Nomination Committee and aligned with overall ESG strategy. Committee will assess achievement against objectives on a 5-point scale and will award scores as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Strategic |
10% |
Internal targets as approved by Remuneration and Nomination Committee and aligned with overall business strategy. Committee will assess achievement against objectives on a 5-point scale and will award scores as follows:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In addition, the vesting of awards can be modified based on the extent to which the participant meets their individual performance conditions. The modification can result in an upward or downward adjustment of the vesting outcome with an upward adjustment capped at 1.2 x the vesting outcome.
These performance conditions will apply to executive directors and other members of the Management Board (prescribed officers) in respect of SAR Plan awards and to executive directors, other members of the Management Board (prescribed officers) and identified investment executives in respect of CSP awards.
All other participants to the CSP will be allocated retention awards and will have to be in the service of the Remgro Group upon vesting.
Early termination of employment |
|
Participants may either be classified as “bad leavers” or “good leavers” and the following applies:
|
Change of control |
|
In the event of a change of control of the Company occurring before the vesting date of any award, a portion of the award held by a participant will vest as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter. The portion of the award which shall vest will be determined based on the number of months served from the award date to the change of control date, over the total number of months in the vesting period and the extent to which the performance condition(s), if applicable, have been met. Any awards which do not vest will, subject to the discretion of the committee, remain subject to the terms of the relevant award letter. |
Variation in share capital |
|
Participants shall continue to participate in the SAR Plan and the CSP in the event of a variation in the Company’s share capital. The committee may make such adjustment to the award or take such other action to place participants in no worse position than they were prior to the happening of the relevant event and to provide that the fair value of the award immediately after the event is materially the same as the fair value of the award immediately before the event. |
Dilution limits |
|
Individual basis Overall basis |
Settlement considerations |
|
If it is assumed that all of the participants to the SAR Plan exercise all options awarded to them on 1 July 2023, Remgro will have to deliver 523 069 shares in order to settle its obligations. This calculation is based on Remgro’s closing share price on 30 June 2023 of R147.05. A 10% increase or decrease in the Remgro share price will require the number of shares to be delivered to be 664 651 shares and 385 786 shares, respectively. |
If it is assumed that all awards made under the CSP vest on 1 July 2023 in full, Remgro will have to deliver 3 053 129 shares in order to settle its obligations.
|
|
On 30 June 2023 Remgro held sufficient treasury shares to settle its obligations to deliver shares to LTI participants. |
The following illustrations depict the pay mix and the possible remuneration outcomes for the CEO, CFO and the prescribed officer average at minimum, on-target and stretch levels.
Element |
Minimum |
On-target |
Stretch |
||||
| TGP |
TGP for 2024 |
|
|||||
| LTI |
Nil |
The number of instruments granted in the 2023 financial year (in respect of the 2022 award) that will vest if target performance (50%) is achieved, multiplied by the fair value (on grant date). |
The number of instruments granted in the 2023 financial year (in respect of the 2022 award) that will vest if full performance (100%) is achieved, multiplied by the face value (on grant date). | ||||
The Malus and Clawback Policy applies from 1 July 2021 to all new LTI awards.
The committee, in its discretion, may, in terms of the Malus and Clawback Policy, apply Malus and/or Clawback mechanisms to the LTI awards where a trigger event as provided for in the policy has occurred. Malus is applied to reduce awards where the trigger event is discovered before vesting or settlement of an award, whereas Clawback is used to recoup all or a portion of settled awards where a trigger event is discovered within three years post-vesting or settlement.
Trigger events include but are not limited to circumstances where any one or more of the following events have occurred:
Executive directors and members of the Management Board do not have fixed-term contracts, but are employed in terms of the Company’s standard contract of employment applicable to all employees. The notice period for termination of service is one calendar month and the normal retirement age is 63. Executive directors and members of the Management Board also do not have exceptional benefits associated with the termination of their services. Upon termination of employment, any payments made to employees will be as required in terms of legislation, and the consequences in respect of unexercised SARs and/or unvested CSP awards will be governed by the rules of the SAR Plan (or previous SAR Scheme) and CSP based on the reasons for the termination of employment.
Independent non-executive directors do not have any employment contracts, do not receive any benefits associated with permanent employment and do not participate in the Company’s LTI plans.
Furthermore, they are categorised as independent on the basis that the Board concludes that they have no interest, position, association or relationship which, judged from the perspective of a reasonable and informed third party, is likely to influence unduly or cause bias in decision-making in the best interest of the Company.
The independence of independent non-executive directors is reviewed annually and the independence of non-executive directors, who have served on the Board for more than nine years, is subject to a rigorous review by the Board. The Board, led by the Lead Independent Director, considered the independence of the independent non-executive directors, and is satisfied with their independence, including the independence of Messrs F Robertson (appointed 28 March 2001), M Morobe (appointed 18 June 2007), N P Mageza (appointed 4 November 2009) and P J Moleketi (appointed 4 November 2009) who each has served on the Remgro Board for more than nine years. Based on an evaluation of the aforementioned directors, there is no evidence of any circumstances or relationships that will impair their judgement, and the Board is satisfied that their independence is in no way affected by their length of service.
Independent non-executive directors are paid a fixed annual Board fee. Committee fees are also determined on a fixed annual basis. The fee structure is reviewed annually on 1 July. During the year under review the committee commissioned a comprehensive and bespoke survey amongst comparable companies based on inter alia, turnover, total assets, profit before tax, earnings before EBIT or EBITDA and/or market capitalisation. The committee considered the median fees of the comparator companies based on an annual fee and fee per meeting basis and compared against the number of committee meetings attended per annum. Non-executive director fees are approved by shareholders at the Company’s AGM by special resolution prior to payment. Remgro also pays for all travelling and accommodation expenses reasonably and properly incurred in order to attend meetings.
Messrs J P Rupert, A E Rupert, P J Neethling and J Malherbe are regarded as non-independent non-executive directors.
The Chairman, Messrs A E Rupert and P J Neethling receive no emoluments or fees from Remgro, whilst Mr J Malherbe receives the approved annual Board and committee fees paid to independent non-executive directors.
As in the case of independent non-executive directors, these directors do not participate in the Company’s LTI plans.
The proposed fee structure, based on the outcome of the bespoke NED fee survey and payable to non-executive directors for the year ending 30 June 2024 is presented in the table above. Also see Special Resolution Number 1 in the Notice to shareholders.
| Type of fee (Rand) | Current fee for the year ended 30 June 2023 |
Proposed fee for the year ending 30 June 2024(1) |
% Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board member | 413 400 | 445 000 | 7.6% |
| Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee | 340 000 | 361 000 | 6.2% |
| Member of the Audit and Risk Committee | 168 800 | 180 000 | 6.6% |
| Member of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee | 75 000 | 80 000 | 6.7% |
| Chairman of the Social and Ethics Committee | 137 400 | 175 000 | 27.6% |
| Member of the Social and Ethics Committee | 75 000 | 95 000 | 26.7% |
| Chairman of Investment Committee | – | 146 000 | – |
| Member of Investment Committee | – | 80 000 | – |
| Chairman of Valuation Committee | – | 146 000 | – |
| Member of Valuation Committee | – | 80 000 | – |
| Chairman of Strategic ESG Committee | – | 146 000 | – |
| Member of Strategic ESG Committee | – | 80 000 | – |
| Meeting fee for ad hoc Committees | 31 800 | 32 000 | 0.6% |
The Remuneration Policy and Remuneration Implementation Report are respectively tabled for separate non-binding advisory votes by the shareholders at each AGM.
The committee will engage with shareholders in the event of a 25% or more dissenting vote on either or both the Remuneration Policy and Remuneration Implementation Report. In that event, the Company will, in its voting results announcement provide for (1) an invitation to dissenting shareholders to engage with the Company, and (2) the manner and timing of such engagement. In this regard the Company intends to (1) invite the dissenting shareholders to provide the Company with their written submissions as to why they voted against the Remuneration Policy or Remuneration Implementation Report, (2) address the legitimate and reasonable objections of dissenting shareholders, and (3) report back to the dissenting shareholders. If appropriate and practical, the Company may engage with dissenting shareholders either individually or collectively at meetings called for that purpose. Other methods of shareholder engagement may include conference calls, emails and investor roadshows.
The Remuneration Implementation Report provides details on how Remgro implemented its Remuneration Policy during the 2023 financial year (the information here was audited). This Remuneration Implementation Report will be put to a non-binding advisory vote by shareholders at the next AGM on 4 December 2023.
During the year under review, the executive directors and other members of the Management Board and senior executives received an average salary increase of 5.80%. Management employees received an average increase of 6.00% while non-management level employees received average increases of between 6.25% and 6.50% dependent on their level in the company
Remgro’s Remuneration Policy does not provide for any short- term incentives, therefore no outcomes are reported in terms of this.
The performance conditions for the December 2022 awards with a performance period from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2025 are set out below.
|
Performance measure |
Weight |
Threshold (vesting 30%)(1) |
On-target (vesting 50%)(1) |
Stretch (vesting 100%)(1) |
|
INAV |
55% |
Year one INAV plus CPI over three financial years |
Year one INAV plus the 3 – 5 year SA Long bond rate over three financial years |
Year one INAV plus the 3 –5 year SA Long bond rate plus 5% over three financial years |
|
Free cash flow (FCF) |
25% |
Year one FCF plus CPI over three financial years |
n/a |
Year one FCF plus CPI plus 2.0% over three financial years |
|
ESG |
20% |
The following to be achieved by 31 December 2023:
|
The following needs to be achieved by 30 June 2024:
|
The following needs to be achieved by 30 June 2025:
|
The performance outcomes for the 2020 LTI award, with a performance period from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2023, are set out below.
As communicated in our 2022 report, the 2019 and 2020 LTI award is the first award which incorporates ESG performance measures. These measures take the form of qualitative ESG milestones, aimed at driving the momentum and success of our ESG journey, and primarily focused on governance, risk and strategic investment decisions as well as portfolio impact.
Performance |
Weight |
Base |
Threshold |
On-target |
Stretch |
Actual |
Actual |
|||||||||
| INAV Performance hurdles and outcome (Rand per share) |
Year one INAV plus CPI over three financial years | Year oneINAV plus the 3 – 5 year
SA Longbond rate over three financial years |
Year one INAV plus the 3 – 5 year SA Longbond rate plus 5% over three financial years | |||||||||||||
| 55% | 153.53(1) | 179.86 | 193.64 | 221.79 | 248.47 | 100% | ||||||||||
| FCF Performance hurdles and outcome (cents per share) |
Year one FCF plus CPI over three financial years | n/a | Year one FCF plus CPI plus 1.25% over three financial years | |||||||||||||
| 25% | 391.00(1) | 1 290.70 | n/a | 1 322.40 | 953.10 | 0% | ||||||||||
Performance |
Weight |
Threshold |
On-target
|
Stretch
|
||||||
| ESG | 20% |
The following needs to be achieved by December 2021:
|
The following needs to be achieved by 30 June 2022:
|
The following needs to be achieved by 31 December 2022:
|
||||||
| Actual performance |
100% achieved |
100% achieved |
90% achieved |
|||||||
LTI vesting |
18% | |||||||||
LTI vesting outcome |
LTI vesting outcome |
LTI vesting outcome (total) |
||||
| 55% |
18% |
73% |
||||
The tables below provide information on a director and prescribed officer basis of SARs granted and accepted during the year and the indicative value of SARs not yet exercised (outstanding SARs). It also illustrates the cash value of SARs exercised during the year.
| Participant | Offer date(1) |
Offer price(2) (Rand) |
Number of SARs offered and accepted |
Fair value of SARs on offer date (R’000) |
Balance of SARs accepted as at 30 June 2022 | Adjusted offer price(3) (Rand) |
SARs accepted/ (exercised or expired) during the year |
Share price on exercise date (Rand) |
Cash value of SARs exercised during the year(4) (R’000) |
Balance of SARs accepted as at 30 June 2023(5) |
Fair value of SARs as at 30 June 2023(6) (R’000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | |||||||||||
| J J Durand | 29-Nov-12(7) | 147.25 | 271 258 | 10 763 | 271 258 | 90.97 | 271 258 | 15 615 | |||
| 04-Dec-13(7) | 191.70 | 93 128 | 5 064 | 93 128 | 127.80 | (93 128) | 144.47 | 1 925 | – | – | |
| 26-Nov-14(7) | 253.53 | 108 468 | 7 442 | 108 468 | 160.29 | 108 468 | 386 | ||||
| 24-Nov-15(7) | 272.00 | 192 676 | 15 591 | 192 676 | 15 591 | 192 676 | 166.08 | 192 676 | 414 | ||
| 01-Dec-16 | 209.11 | 150 872 | 10 554 | 150 872 | 122.38 | (150 872) | 144.47 | 3 333 | – | – | |
| 14-Dec-17 | 206.35 | 132 309 | 9 705 | 132 309 | 114.92 | 132 309 | 5 637 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20(8) | 93.82 | 235 427 | 6 111 | 235 427 | 89.21 | (68 272) | 167 155 | 6 600 | |||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 235 454 | 6 631 | 235 454 | 89.69 | 235 454 | 9 733 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 181 379 | 7 853 | 181 379 | 121.63 | 181 379 | 6 251 | ||||
| 05-Dec-22 | 141.64 | 172 168 | 8 509 | – | 141.64 | 172 168 | 172 168 | 5 548 | |||
| M Lubbe | 29-Nov-12(7) | 147.25 | 13 961 | 554 | 13 961 | 90.97 | 13 961 | 804 | |||
| 04-Dec-13(7) | 191.70 | 7 444 | 405 | 7 444 | 127.80 | (7 444) | 147.57 | 177 | – | – | |
| 26-Nov-14(7) | 253.53 | 4 011 | 275 | 4 011 | 160.29 | 4 011 | 14 | ||||
| 24-Nov-15(7) | 272.00 | 8 036 | 650 | 8 036 | 166.08 | 8 036 | 17 | ||||
| 01-Dec-16 | 209.11 | 65 632 | 4 591 | 65 632 | 122.38 | (65 632) | 147.57 | 1 653 | – | – | |
| 14-Dec-17 | 206.35 | 15 481 | 1 136 | 15 481 | 114.92 | 15 481 | 660 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20(8) | 93.82 | 39 078 | 1 014 | 39 078 | 89.21 | (11 331) | 27 747 | 1 096 | |||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 46 448 | 1 308 | 46 448 | 89.69 | 46 448 | 1 920 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 35 796 | 1 550 | 35 796 | 121.63 | 35 796 | 1 234 | ||||
| 05-Dec-22 | 141.64 | 37 780 | 1 867 | – | 141.64 | 37 780 | 37 780 | 1 218 | |||
| N J Williams | 29-Nov-12(7) | 147.25 | 81 901 | 3 250 | 81 901 | 90.97 | 81 901 | 4 715 | |||
| 04-Dec-13(7) | 191.70 | 22 221 | 1 208 | 22 221 | 123.80 | (22 221) | 147.57 | 528 | – | – | |
| 26-Nov-14(7) | 253.53 | 16 430 | 1 127 | 16 430 | 160.29 | 16 430 | 58 | ||||
| 24-Nov-15(7) | 272.00 | 27 492 | 2 225 | 27 492 | 166.08 | 27 492 | 59 | ||||
| 01-Dec-16 | 209.11 | 98 716 | 6 905 | 98 716 | 122.38 | (98 716) | 147.57 | 2 487 | – | – | |
| 14-Dec-17 | 206.35 | 55 677 | 4 084 | 55 677 | 114.92 | 55 677 | 2 372 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20(8) | 93.82 | 72 103 | 1 871 | 72 103 | 89.21 | (20 908) | 51 195 | 2 021 | |||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 72 124 | 2 031 | 72 124 | 89.69 | 72 124 | 2 981 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 55 568 | 2 406 | 55 568 | 121.63 | 55 568 | 1 915 | ||||
| 05-Dec-22 | 141.64 | 58 623 | 2 897 | – | 141.64 | 58 623 | 58 623 | 1 889 | |||
| Total | 2 339 090 | (269 953) | 10 103 | 2 069 137 | 73 157 | ||||||
| Participant | Offer date(1) |
Offer price(2) (Rand) |
Number of SARs offered and accepted |
Fair value of SARs on offer date (R’000) |
Balance of SARs accepted as at 30 June 2021 |
Adjusted offer price(3 ) (Rand) |
SARs accepted/ (exercised or expired) during the year |
Share price on exercise date (Rand) |
Cash value of SARs exercised during the year(4) (R’000) |
Balance of SARs accepted as at 30 June 2022(5) |
Fair value of SARs as at 30 June 2022(6) (R’000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | |||||||||||
| J J Durand | 29-Nov-12(7) | 147.25 | 271 258 | 10 763 | 271 258 | 94.22 | 271 258 | 10 614 | |||
| 04-Dec-13(7) | 191.70 | 93 128 | 5 064 | 93 128 | 127.40 | 93 128 | 1 597 | ||||
| 26-Nov-14(7) | 253.53 | 108 468 | 7 442 | 108 468 | 164.57 | 108 468 | 535 | ||||
| 24-Nov-15(7) | 272.00 | 192 676 | 15 591 | 192 676 | 170.38 | 192 676 | 823 | ||||
| 01-Dec-16 | 209.11 | 150 872 | 10 554 | 150 872 | 125.95 | 150 872 | 2 561 | ||||
| 14-Dec-17 | 206.35 | 132 309 | 9 705 | 132 309 | 118.86 | 132 309 | 2 918 | ||||
| 05-Dec-18(8) | 205.07 | 87 135 | 5 436 | 87 135 | 112.38 | (87 135) | – | – | |||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 235 427 | 6 111 | – | 93.82 | 235 427 | 7 415 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 235 454 | 6 631 | – | 93.82 | 235 454 | 8 300 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 181 379 | 7 853 | – | 126.99 | 181 379 | 181 379 | 5 362 | |||
| M Lubbe | 29-Nov-12(7) | 147.25 | 13 961 | 554 | 13 961 | 94.22 | 13 961 | 546 | |||
| 04-Dec-13(7) | 191.70 | 7 444 | 405 | 7 444 | 127.40 | 7 444 | 128 | ||||
| 26-Nov-14(7) | 253.53 | 4 011 | 275 | 4 011 | 164.57 | 4 011 | 20 | ||||
| 24-Nov-15(7) | 272.00 | 8 036 | 650 | 8 036 | 170.38 | 8 036 | 34 | ||||
| 01-Dec-16 | 209.11 | 65 632 | 4 591 | 65 632 | 125.95 | 65 632 | 1 114 | ||||
| 14-Dec-17 | 206.35 | 15 481 | 1 136 | 15 481 | 118.86 | 15 481 | 341 | ||||
| 05-Dec-18(8) | 205.07 | 14 648 | 914 | 14 648 | 112.38 | (14 648) | – | – | |||
| 05-Dec-20(8) | 93.82 | 39 078 | 1 014 | – | 93.82 | 39 078 | 1 231 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 46 448 | 1 308 | 46 448 | 93.82 | 46 448 | 1 637 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 35 796 | 1 550 | - | 126.99 | 35 796 | 35 796 | 1 058 | |||
| N J Williams | 29-Nov-12(7) | 147.25 | 81 901 | 3 250 | 81 901 | 94.22 | 81 901 | 3 205 | |||
| 04-Dec-13(7) | 191.70 | 22 221 | 1 208 | 22 221 | 127.40 | 22 221 | 381 | ||||
| 26-Nov-14(7) | 253.53 | 16 430 | 1 127 | 16 430 | 164.57 | 16 430 | 81 | ||||
| 24-Nov-15(7) | 272.00 | 27 492 | 2 225 | 27 492 | 170.38 | 27 492 | 117 | ||||
| 01-Dec-16 | 209.11 | 98 716 | 6 905 | 98 716 | 125.95 | 98 716 | 1 675 | ||||
| 14-Dec-17 | 206.35 | 55 677 | 4 084 | 55 677 | 118.86 | 55 677 | 1 228 | ||||
| 05-Dec-18(8) | 205.07 | 28 465 | 1 776 | 28 465 | 112.38 | (28 465) | – | – | |||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 72 103 | 1 871 | 72 103 | 93.82 | 72 103 | |||||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 72 124 | 2 031 | – | 93.82 | 72 124 | 2 542 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 55 568 | 2 406 | – | 126.99 | 55 568 | 55 568 | 1 643 | |||
| Total | 2 196 595 | 142 495 | – | 2 339 090 | 59 377 | ||||||
| Participant | Offer date(1) |
Offer price(2) (Rand) |
Number of SARs offered and accepted |
Fair value of SARs on offer date (R’000) |
Balance of SARs accepted as at 30 June 2022 |
Adjusted offer price(3) (Rand) |
SARs accepted/ (exercised or expired) during the year |
Share price on exercise date (Rand) |
Cash value of SARs exercised during the year(4) (R’000) |
Balance of SARs accepted as at 30 June 2023(5) |
Fair value of SARs as at 30 June 2023(6) (R’000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P R Louw | 29-Nov-12(7) | 147.25 | 22 646 | 899 | 22 646 | 90.97 | (22 646) | 146.18 | 1 250 | – | – |
| 04-Dec-13(7) | 191.70 | 12 944 | 704 | 12 944 | 123.80 | (12 944) | 146.18 | 290 | – | – | |
| 26-Nov-14(7) | 253.53 | 5 952 | 408 | 5 952 | 160.29 | 5 952 | 21 | ||||
| 24-Nov-15(7) | 272.00 | 9 497 | 768 | 9 497 | 166.08 | 9 497 | 20 | ||||
| 01-Dec-16 | 209.11 | 91 120 | 6 374 | 91 120 | 122.38 | (91 120) | 146.18 | 2 169 | – | – | |
| 14-Dec-17 | 206.35 | 20 301 | 1 489 | 20 301 | 114.92 | 20 301 | 865 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20(8) | 93.82 | 46 428 | 1 205 | 46 428 | 89.21 | (13 464) | 32 964 | 1 302 | |||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 46 448 | 1 308 | 46 448 | 89.69 | 46 448 | 1 920 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 35 796 | 1 550 | 35 796 | 121.63 | 35 796 | 1 234 | ||||
| 05-Dec-22 | 141.64 | 37 780 | 1 867 | – | 141.64 | 37 780 | 37 780 | 1 218 | |||
| P J Uys | 02-Apr-13(7) | 183.15 | 218 400 | 10 519 | 218 400 | 118.16 | 218 400 | 6 919 | |||
| 04-Dec-13(7) | 191.70 | 3 325 | 181 | 3 325 | 123.80 | 3 325 | 88 | ||||
| 26-Nov-14(7) | 253.53 | 14 774 | 1 014 | 14 774 | 160.29 | 14 774 | 53 | ||||
| 24-Nov-15(7) | 272.00 | 11 533 | 933 | 11 533 | 166.08 | 11 533 | 25 | ||||
| 01-Dec-16 | 209.11 | 91 463 | 6 398 | 91 463 | 122.38 | 91 463 | 2 542 | ||||
| 14-Dec-17 | 206.35 | 85 936 | 6 303 | 85 936 | 114.92 | 85 936 | 3 661 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20(8) | 93.82 | 88 088 | 2 286 | 88 088 | 89.21 | (25 543) | 62 545 | 2 470 | |||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 88 108 | 2 481 | 88 108 | 89.69 | 88 108 | 3 642 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 67 853 | 2 938 | 67 853 | 121.63 | 67 853 | 2 339 | ||||
| 05-Dec-22 | 141.64 | 71 565 | 3 537 | – | 141.64 | 71 565 | 71 565 | 2 306 | |||
| Total | 960 612 | (56 372) | 3 709 | 904 240 | 30 625 | ||||||
| Participant | Offer date(1) |
Offer price(2) (Rand) |
Number of SARs offered and accepted |
Fair value of SARs on offer date (R’000) |
Balance of SARs accepted as at 30 June 2021 |
Adjusted offer price(3) (Rand) |
SARs accepted/ (exercised or expired) during the year |
Share price on exercise date (Rand) |
Cash value of SARs exercised during the year(4) (R’000) |
Balance of SARs accepted as at 30 June 2022(5) |
Fair value of SARs as at 30 June 2022(6) (R’000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P R Louw | 29-Nov-12(7) | 147.25 | 22 646 | 899 | 22 646 | 94.22 | 22 646 | 886 | |||
| 04-Dec-13(7) | 191.70 | 12 944 | 704 | 12 944 | 127.40 | 12 944 | 222 | ||||
| 26-Nov-14(7) | 253.53 | 5 952 | 408 | 5 952 | 164.57 | 5 952 | 29 | ||||
| 24-Nov-15(7) | 272.00 | 9 497 | 768 | 9 497 | 170.38 | 9 497 | 41 | ||||
| 01-Dec-16 | 209.11 | 91 120 | 6 374 | 91 120 | 125.95 | 91 120 | 1 546 | ||||
| 14-Dec-17 | 206.35 | 20 301 | 1 489 | 20 301 | 118.86 | 20 301 | 448 | ||||
| 05-Dec-18(8) | 205.07 | 17 881 | 1 116 | 17 881 | 112.38 | (17 881) | – | – | |||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 46 428 | 1 205 | 46 428 | 93.82 | 46 428 | 1 462 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 46 448 | 1 308 | 46 448 | 93.82 | 46 448 | 1 637 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 35 796 | 1 550 | – | 126.99 | 35 796 | 35 796 | 1 058 | |||
| P J Uys | 02-Apr-13(7) | 183.15 | 218 400 | 10 519 | 218 400 | 121.67 | 218 400 | 4 732 | |||
| 04-Dec-13(7) | 191.70 | 3 325 | 181 | 3 325 | 127.40 | 3 325 | 57 | ||||
| 26-Nov-14(7) | 253.53 | 14 774 | 1 014 | 14 774 | 164.57 | 14 774 | 128 | ||||
| 24-Nov-15(7) | 272.00 | 11 533 | 933 | 11 533 | 170.38 | 11 533 | 49 | ||||
| 01-Dec-16 | 209.11 | 91 463 | 6 398 | 91 463 | 125.95 | 91 463 | 1 552 | ||||
| 14-Dec-17 | 206.35 | 85 936 | 6 303 | 85 936 | 118.86 | 85 936 | 1 895 | ||||
| 05-Dec-18(8) | 205.07 | 35 822 | 2 235 | 35 822 | 112.38 | (35 822) | – | – | |||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 88 088 | 2 286 | 88 088 | 93.82 | 88 088 | 2 774 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 88 108 | 2 481 | 88 108 | 93.82 | 88 108 | 3 106 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 67 853 | 2 938 | – | 126.99 | 67 853 | 67 853 | 2 006 | |||
| Total | 910 666 | 49 946 | – | 960 612 | 23 573 | ||||||
The tables below provide information on a director and prescribed officer basis of CSPs granted and accepted during the year. It also illustrates the cash value of CSPs vested during the year.
| Participant | Offer date(1) |
Offer price(2) (Rand) |
Number of CSPs offered and accepted |
Fair value of CSPs on offer date (R’000) |
Balance of CSPs accepted as at 30 June 2022 |
CSPs accepted/ (exercised or expired) during the year |
Additional CSPs from Grindrod Unbundling(3) |
Additional CSPs from dividends(4) |
CSPs exercised during the year |
Cash value of CSPs vesting in year(5) (R’000) |
Balance of CSPs accepted as at 30 June 2023(6) |
Fair value of CSPs as at 30 June 2023(7) (R’000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | ||||||||||||
| J J Durand | 05-Dec-18(8) | 93.82 | 235 427 | 20 366 | 235 427 | (69 766) | 5 156 | 996 | (57 937) | 8 206 | 113 876 | 10 047 |
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 235 427 | 19 655 | 235 454 | 5 157 | 240 611 | 21 229 | |||||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 95 672 | 8 728 | 95 672 | 2 096 | 855 | 98 623 | 14 503 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 181 379 | 20 747 | 181 379 | 3 973 | 185 352 | 16 354 | |||||
| 05-Dec-22 | 141.64 | 172 168 | 23 623 | – | 172 168 | 172 168 | 15 190 | |||||
| M Lubbe | 05-Dec-18(8) | 93.82 | 39 078 | 3 380 | 39 078 | (11 577) | 856 | 166 | (9 619) | 1 362 | 18 904 | 1 668 |
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 46 448 | 3 877 | 46 448 | 1 018 | 47 466 | 4 188 | |||||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 4 924 | 449 | 4 924 | 108 | 45 | 5 077 | 747 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 35 796 | 4 094 | 35 796 | 784 | 36 580 | 3 227 | |||||
| 05-Dec-22 | 141.64 | 37 780 | 5 184 | – | 37 780 | 37 780 | 3 333 | |||||
| N J Williams | 05-Dec-18(8) | 93.82 | 72 103 | 6 237 | 72 103 | (21 365) | 1 580 | 306 | (17 746) | 2 514 | 34 878 | 3 077 |
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 72 124 | 6 021 | 72 124 | 1 580 | 73 704 | 6 503 | |||||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 28 887 | 2 635 | 28 887 | 633 | 259 | 29 779 | 4 379 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 55 568 | 6 356 | 55 568 | 1 217 | 56 785 | 5 010 | |||||
| 05-Dec-22 | 141.64 | 58 623 | 8 044 | – | 58 623 | 5 172 | 58 623 | |||||
| Total | 1 102 860 | 165 863 | 24 158 | 2 627 | (85 302) | 12 082 | 1 210 206 | 114 627 | ||||
| Participant | Offer date(1) |
Offer price(2) (Rand) |
Number of CSPs offered and accepted |
Fair value of CSPs on offer date (R’000) |
Balance of CSPs accepted as at 30 June 2021 |
CSPs accepted/ (exercised or expired) during the year |
Share price on vesting date(3) (Rand) |
Cash value of CSPs vesting in year(4) (R’000) |
Balance of CSPs accepted as at 30 June 2022(5, 6) |
Fair value of CSPs as at 30 June 2022(7) (R’000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | ||||||||||
| J J Durand | 05-Dec-18(8) | 205.07 | 120 107 | 15 933 | 120 107 | (120 107) | – | – | ||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 235 427 | 20 366 | 235 427 | 235 427 | 17 970 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 235 454 | 19 655 | 235 454 | 235 454 | 17 644 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20(10) | 93.82 | 95 672 | 8 728 | 95 672 | 95 672 | 6 198 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 181 379 | 20 747 | – | 181 379 | 181 379 | 13 344 | |||
| M Lubbe | 05-Dec-18(8) | 205.07 | 20 191 | 2 678 | 20 191 | (20 191) | – | – | ||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 39 078 | 3 380 | 39 078 | 39 078 | 2 983 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 46 448 | 3 877 | 46 448 | 46 448 | 3 481 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20(10) | 93.82 | 4 924 | 449 | 4 924 | 4 924 | 319 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 35 796 | 4 094 | – | 35 796 | 35 796 | 2 634 | |||
| N J Williams | 05-Dec-18(8) | 205.07 | 39 237 | 5 205 | 39 237 | (39 237) | – | – | ||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 72 103 | 6 237 | 72 103 | 72 103 | 5 503 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 72 124 | 6 021 | 72 124 | 72 124 | 5 405 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20(10) | 93.82 | 28 887 | 2 635 | 28 887 | 28 887 | 1 871 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 55 568 | 6 356 | – | 55 568 | 55 568 | 4 088 | |||
| Total | 1 009 652 | 93 208 | – | 1 102 860 | 81 440 | |||||
| Participant | Offer date(1) |
Offer price(2) (Rand) |
Number of CSPs offered and accepted |
Fair value of CSPs on offer date (R’000) |
Balance of CSPs accepted as at 30 June 2022 |
CSPs accepted/ (exercised or expired) during the year |
Additional CSPs from Grindrod Unbundling(3) |
Additional CSPs from dividends(4) |
CSPs exercised during the year |
Cash value of CSPs vesting in year(5) (R’000) |
Balance of CSPs accepted as at 30 June 2023(6) |
Fair value of CSPs as at 30 June 2023(7 ) (R’000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P R Louw | 05-Dec-18(8) | 93.82 | 46 428 | 4 016 | 46 428 | (13 758) | 1 017 | 197 | (11 426) | 1 618 | 22 458 | 1 981 |
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 46 428 | 3 877 | 46 448 | 1 018 | 47 466 | 4 188 | |||||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 7 988 | 729 | 7 988 | 175 | 72 | (8 235) | – | – | |||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 35 796 | 4 094 | 35 796 | 784 | 36 580 | 1 936 | |||||
| 05-Dec-22 | 141.64 | 37 780 | 5 184 | – | 37 780 | 3 333 | 37 780 | |||||
| P J Uys | 05-Dec-18(8) | 93.82 | 88 088 | 7 620 | 88 0888 | (26 101) | 1 930 | 374 | (21 681) | 3 071 | 49 378 | 3 759 |
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 88 108 | 7 355 | 88 108 | 1 930 | 90 038 | 7 944 | |||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 67 853 | 7 761 | 67 853 | 1 486 | 69 339 | 6 118 | |||||
| 05-Dec-22 | 141.64 | 71 565 | 9 819 | – | 71 565 | 71 565 | 6 314 | |||||
| Total | 380 709 | 69 486 | 8 340 | 643 | (41 342) | 4 689 | 417 836 | 35 573 | ||||
| Participant | Offer date(1) |
Offer price(2) (Rand) |
Number of CSPs offered and accepted |
Fair value of CSPs on offer date (R’000) |
Balance of CSPs accepted as at 30 June 2021 |
CSPs accepted/ (exercised or expired) during the year |
Share price on vesting date(3) (Rand) |
Cash value of CSPs vesting in year(4) (R’000) |
Balance of CSPs accepted as at 30 June 2022(5, 6) |
Fair value of CSPs as at 30 June 2022(7) (R’000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P R Louw | 05-Dec-18(8) | 205.07 | 24 648 | 3 270 | 24 648 | (24 648) | – | – | ||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 46 428 | 4 016 | 46 428 | 46 428 | 3 544 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 46 448 | 3 877 | 46 448 | 46 448 | 3 481 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20(10) | 93.82 | 7 988 | 729 | 7 988 | 7 988 | 518 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 35 796 | 4 094 | – | 35 796 | –35 796 | 2 634 | |||
| P J Uys | 05-Dec-18(8) | 205.07 | 49 378 | 6 550 | 49 378 | (49 378) | – | – | ||
| 05-Dec-20(9) | 93.82 | 88 088 | 7 620 | 88 088 | 88 088 | 6 724 | ||||
| 05-Dec-20 | 93.82 | 88 108 | 7 355 | 88 108 | 88 108 | 6 602 | ||||
| 05-Dec-21 | 126.99 | 67 853 | 7 761 | – | 67 853 | 67 853 | 4 992 | |||
| Total | 351 086 | 29 623 | – | 380 709 | 28 495 | |||||
Linking pay with the delivery of long-term shareholder value
The graph above illustrates the following:
| 1. | LTI intrinsic value vested – The stacked columns represent the intrinsic value that vested (for SARs and CSPs) to the CEO as at the end of each reporting period for the last five years. With regards to the SARs, it should be noted that the awards vesting in 2019 to 2020 had no performance conditions attached (other than the inherent condition for share price growth above the strike price) and as a result the vesting outcome was 100%. However, these awards were underwater as at the end of their respective financial years (i.e. the share price at year-end was below the strike price) and as a result the intrinsic value of these awards amount to R0 which resulted in no value vesting at the reporting date for these awards. The SARs vesting in years 2021 to 2023 had performance conditions attached and the vesting outcomes for these awards were 0%, 71% and 73% respectively. As a result in:
With regard to the CSPs, the first award of CSPs was made in 2018 and vested in 2021. The CSPs vesting outcomes in 2021 to 2023 were 0%, 71% and 73% respectively. As a result in:
Please note that the SARs and CSPs vesting in 2022 were awarded in 2020 and as a result these had a reduced performance period of two years instead of three years. This is due to the fact that no awards were made in 2019 as a result of the impacts of Covid-19, and as a result these allocations were only made in 2020. |
| 2. | TSR performance over the performance period – Overlaid to the value vested graph is a line graph which represents the TSR CAGR performance outcome that was achieved during the performance period for each of the awards. As a result, for the awards vesting in years 2019 – 2021 & 2023 the TSR represents a three-year CAGR outcome, whereas due to the fact that the awards vesting in 2022 were only awarded in 2020 (as noted above), the TSR outcome for 2022 represents a two-year TSR CAGR in order to align with the performance period of the awards. In interpreting the outcomes of the graph, it can be seen that there is alignment between the CEO vesting outcomes and shareholder value creation, as:
|
The tables below provide information on the single figure remuneration for executive directors and prescribed officers, which comprises a fixed annual amount, as well as the value of the shares vesting 12 months after year-end.
| R’000 | Fees | Salaries | Retirement fund |
Other benefits(1) |
Fixed remuneration |
LTI(2) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June 2023 | |||||||
| J J Durand | 413 | 12 819 | 2 625 | 442 | 16 299 | 23 490 | 39 789 |
| M Lubbe | 413 | 2 807 | 639 | 456 | 4 315 | 4 272 | 8 587 |
| N J Williams | 413 | 4 778 | 1 030 | 445 | 6 666 | 7 195 | 13 861 |
| Total | 1 239 | 20 404 | 4 294 | 1 343 | 27 280 | 34 957 | 62 237 |
| 30 June 2022 | |||||||
| J J Durand | 390 | 12 107 | 2 479 | 419 | 15 395 | 34 957 | 25 077 |
| M Lubbe | 390 | 2 647 | 602 | 431 | 4 070 | 9 682 | 5 653 |
| N J Williams | 390 | 4 509 | 965 | 423 | 6 287 | 3 021 | 9 308 |
| Total | 1 170 | 19 263 | 4 046 | 1 273 | 25 752 | 14 286 | 40 038 |
| R’000 | Salaries | Retirement fund |
Other benefits(1) |
Fixed remuneration |
LTI(2) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June 2023 | ||||||
| P R Louw | 3 220 | 639 | 456 | 4 315 | 4 634 | 8 949 |
| P J Uys | 6 456 | 1 276 | 403 | 8 135 | 8 790 | 16 925 |
| Total | 9 676 | 1 915 | 859 | 12 450 | 13 424 | 25 874 |
| 30 June 2022 | ||||||
| P R Louw | 3 037 | 598 | 432 | 4 067 | 1 886 | 5 953 |
| P J Uys | 6 074 | 1 196 | 387 | 7 657 | 3 755 | 11 412 |
| Total | 9 111 | 1 794 | 819 | 11 724 | 5 641 | 17 365 |
The actual fees paid to non-executive directors are disclosed below (on an individual basis).
| R’000 | Fee for the year ended 30 June 2023 |
Fee for the year ended 30 June 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-executive (independent) | ||
| S E N De Bruyn | 1 094 | 972 |
| T Leoka(1) | 103 | – |
| N P Mageza(2) | 657 | 620 |
| P J Moleketi | 657 | 620 |
| M Morobe(3) | 678 | 580 |
| G G Nieuwoudt | 477 | 480 |
| K S Rantloane | 604 | 540 |
| F Robertson | 721 | 680 |
| Subtotal | 4 991 | 4 492 |
| Non-executive (non-independent) | ||
| J Malherbe | 477 | 480 |
| P J Neethling(4) | – | – |
| A E Rupert(4) | – | – |
| J P Rupert(4) | – | – |
| Subtotal | 477 | 480 |
| Total | 5 468 | 4 972 |
![]()
Johann Rupert
Chairman of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee
Stellenbosch
20 September 2023