| GENERAL REVIEW |
|
Headline
earnings per share increased by
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
16.1% from 814.5c to 945.8c
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Headline earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Headline earnings for the year to 31 March 2003 grew by 15.6% from
R4 252 million to R4 914 million.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Headline earnings per share, however, increased by 16.1% from 814.5c to 945.8c reflecting the "uplift" resulting from the share repurchase programme. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| During the year under review, a wholly-owned subsidiary acquired 11.6 million Remgro ordinary shares in the open market, representing 2.4% of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company. The total purchase consideration amounted to R704 million at an average of R60.64 per ordinary share. The shares have not been cancelled and are held as treasury stock. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We have regularly in the past drawn attention to the fact that currency
movements could have a significant impact on the Group's earnings. In
particular, British American Tobacco Plc's (BAT) Sterling profit contribution,
translated into South African rands, amounts to almost 50% of Remgro's
total headline earnings.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The favourable currency impact on translation of BAT's contribution
to headline earnings as set out in the table below, has declined from
R427 million during 2002 to R243 million for the year under review.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It should be noted that BAT's profit contribution is translated at an average exchange rate. If the average for the year to 31 March 2004 was to be equal to the current £/R spot rate, which is lower (i.e. stronger rand) compared to the average rate for the past year, it will result in an unfavourable currency impact during the new financial year. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic earnings
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic earnings per share increased by a substantial 151% to 1 682.9
cents. Basic earnings reflects earnings after goodwill amortisation and
inclusion of non-recurring exceptional items. During the current year,
attributable after-tax exceptional items amounted to R4 293 million. These
included large exceptional gains such as:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash earnings
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Attributable cash earnings (which excludes the Group's share of net
profits retained by associated companies), before exceptional items and
amortisation of goodwill, increased by 41.6% from R1 986 million to R2
813 million or 541.4 cents per share, mainly as a result of an increase
in dividends received from associated companies. The latter amounted to
R2 203 million compared to R1 508 million in 2001/2002, mainly due to
higher dividends from R&R Holdings, FirstRand Limited and RMB Holdings
Limited.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The balance sheet reflects cash and cash equivalents of R2 286 million
at 31 March 2003. Of this, R647 million is attributable to Rainbow Chicken,
Transvaal Sugar and Medi-Clinic Corporation. Cash at the centre amounted
to R1 639 million.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ordinary dividends of 248 cents per share were declared for the year,
compared to 206 cents the previous year. This represents an increase of
20.4%. The dividends are covered 3.8 times by headline earnings and 2.2
times by cash earnings, against 4.0 times and 1.8 times respectively the
previous year.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net asset value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the past we have reported the underlying, or "intrinsic", net asset
value of the Group at year-end, which differs from the book value of net
assets shown in the balance sheet. Such valuation includes all investments,
incorporating subsidiary and associated companies, either at listed market
value or, in the case of unlisted investments, at directors' valuation.
The net assets of wholly-owned non-investment subsidiary companies, consisting
mainly of monetary items, are included at book value.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The intrinsic net asset value as at the end of March 2003, amounted to R76.91 per share compared to R89.50 and R64.32 per share at 31 March 2002 and 2001 respectively. A schedule setting out the calculation of the intrinsic net asset value per share as at 31 March 2003 has been included at the end of this review. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The table below reflects a comparison of the relative performance
of the Remgro intrinsic net asset value per share in relation to certain
selected JSE indices.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No account has been taken of dividends declared on the Remgro shares.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of headline earnings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tobacco | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
R&R HOLDINGS: Effective interest 331/3%
(2002: 331/3%)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Remgro's tobacco interests are represented by a one-third shareholding
in R&R Holdings SA, Luxembourg (R&R). The other two-thirds are
held by Compagnie Financière Richemont SA (Richemont).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In January 2003, R&R issued secured call warrants exercisable
into ordinary shares of BAT in 2004. This transaction effectively locked
in the value of the 120.9 million convertible redeemable preference shares
which R&R has in BAT and which it was obliged to either sell or tender
for redemption in June 2004 at the redemption price of 675 pence per share.
Together with the gross warrant premium of 34.29 pence per share received
in January 2003, the value locked in amounted to 709.29 pence per share,
before costs. R&R also holds 604.3 million BAT ordinary shares.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As a consequence of the warrant issue, the preference shares are now
treated as a debt instrument in the consolidated accounts of R&R and
are no longer equity accounted. For the nine months ended 31 December 2002,
R&R's effective interest in BAT, reflecting the holding of both ordinary
and preference shares, was 31.5%. For the three-month period ended 31
March 2003, R&R has accounted for its 27.9% effective interest in
BAT ordinary shares under the equity method and, in respect of the preference
shares, has recorded the movement in the present value of the shares as
investment income. Similarly, this movement in net present value effectively
became an investment expense for BAT in accounting terms and therefore,
for purposes of equity accounting the interest in the ordinary shares,
R&R reduced BAT's attributable profit for the quarter ended 31 March
2003 accordingly.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Whilst R&R has applied IAS 39 (Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement) in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, the South African equivalent, AC 133, was not yet applicable to Remgro in the year under review. This required Remgro to make the necessary adjustments to the reported results of R&R for the difference in accounting policies. Had R&R not applied IAS 39, the conversion rights embedded in the preference shares would not have been valued, and consequently these conversion rights, represented by the warrant premium, would have been accounted for as income either proportionately over the remaining term of the preference shares, or in one amount upon their redemption in June 2004. Accordingly, the net warrant premium, amounting to £30 million, has been deferred in accounting for Remgro's share of the results of R&R for the year to 31 March 2003. With AC 133 subsequently becoming applicable to Remgro, the deferred income will be included in equity accounted income in the ensuing financial year. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Linked to the realisation of the value of the preference shares and
their reclassification, R&R recorded an exceptional gain during the
year under review, Remgro's share of which amounted to R3 204.4 million.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After elimination of exceptional items and goodwill amortisation and
the necessary adjustments referred to above, R&R's contribution to
Remgro's headline earnings is made up as set out in the table alongside.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BAT had shipments of 777 billion cigarettes in the year to 31 December
2002 representing a global market share of 14.6%. It has a robust position
in all regions worldwide which, together with the broad based portfolio
of international, regional and local brands, provides the platform for
achieving global leadership of the tobacco business. Growth in profit
is achieved by a continuous focus on increasing its share in the key growth
consumer segments of international and premium priced brands.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For BAT the most encouraging aspect of the results for the year was
the impressive growth in their global drive brands. Dunhill, Kent, Lucky
Strike and Pall Mall grew by 8% between them. Dunhill in particular performed
well with sales exceeding 30 billion cigarettes for the first time. Although
Lucky Strike declined in 2002 as a result of the planned reduction in
duty-free sales, the brand should return to growth in 2003 whilst Dunhill,
Kent and Pall Mall should maintain their progress.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Within BAT's regions, America-Pacific's operating profit was in line
with the prior year, reflecting the net effect of a good performance from
all its regional markets offset by the adverse exchange rate movements.
Asia-Pacific, along with the Africa and Middle East regions, suffered
from the planned reduction in duty-free sales with profits down £46
million and £50 million respectively. Latin America performed well
given the exceptionally difficult economic circumstances and political
uncertainty in many countries during the year with profits down £35 million,
reflecting lower volumes and a significant weakening of the region's major
currencies against Sterling. Europe's operating profit was £42 million
higher as a result of solid market performances in Russia, Ukraine, Poland,
Hungary, France and Switzerland. This was despite a significant loss of
profit from the dissolution of the UK partnership, a price war in Romania
and excise tax increases in Germany.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the year to 31 December 2002, BAT's adjusted earnings per share,
arguably the best measure of the company's underlying performance, grew
by 8% as a result of lower net interest expense, an improved tax position
and lower minority charges. These results were achieved despite a 3% decline
in operating profit caused by the impact of weak currencies and the planned
decline in duty-free sales, but at comparable rates of exchange operating
profits were up by 3%.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wine and Spirits
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DISTELL: Effective interest 30.0% (2002: 30.0%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Distell Group Limited (Distell) contributed R76 million to Remgro's
headline earnings, compared to R79 million in the previous year. This
relates to Distell's two consecutive six-month periods ended 31 December
2002.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Distell reported sales volume growth for most of its major brands
for the six months ended 31 December 2002. International sales revenue
increased by 30.7% and comprised 21.6% of total sales revenue. Distell's
trading income increased substantially by 52.3%. This was largely the
result of increased sales revenue, a favourable sales mix and improved
production efficiencies. The increase in trading income was however negated
by the unfavourable effect of the strengthening in the value of the rand
towards the end of 2002.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 18 June 2003 the Competition Tribunal finally approved the merger
between Stellenbosch Farmers' Winery Group Limited and Distillers Corporation
(SA) Limited, subject to Distell relinquishing control of two of its brands
in the South African spirits market, i.e. the Martell and KWV brands.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FINANCIAL SERVICES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contribution to headline earnings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of headline earnings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FIRSTRAND and RMBH | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Both FirstRand Limited (FirstRand) and RMB Holdings Limited (RMBH)
have June year-ends and therefore their results for the twelve months
to 31 December 2002 were equity accounted by Remgro in the year under
review.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resulting from the rand's strength, FirstRand reported exceptional
translation losses amounting to R528 million for the twelve months
to 31 December 2002 (2001: R650 million gain). Remgro's portion of these
translation losses was R90 million (2002: R110 million gain) R50
million through its direct interest in FirstRand, and R40 million
indirectly through its interest in RMBH.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FIRSTRAND: Effective direct interest 9.6% (2002: 9.3%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FirstRand's contribution to Remgro's headline earnings was R424 million
(2002: R437 million). This excludes the indirect contribution of FirstRand
through Remgro's interest in RMBH.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the six months ended 31 December 2002 FirstRand's headline earnings
decreased by 19.3% to R2 223 million (2001: R2 754 million).
FirstRand's core operational headline earnings, before taking into account
the exceptional translation loss mentioned above, increased by 26.7% to
R2 585 million.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
During this period FirstRand's Retail Banking division reflected growth
of 26% over the corresponding period. This increase is due to scale benefits
achieved as a result of organic growth as well as growth resulting from
the acquisition of the mortgage loan books from BoE Limited and Saambou
Bank Limited during the first half of 2002.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RMBH: Effective interest 23.1% (2002: 23.1%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RMBH's contribution to Remgro's headline earnings was R371 million
(2002: R384 million). For the twelve months ended 31 December 2002, 90.7%
(2001: 92.3%) of RMBH's headline earnings was derived from FirstRand while
9.3% (2001: 7.7%) was contributed by its other interests.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RMBH's other interests include RMB Structured Insurance Limited, OUTsurance
Limited (OUTsurance), Glenrand M.I.B Limited and Global Resorts (SA) (Pty)
Limited (GRSA). OUTsurance reported an exceptional six months to December
2002 with record sales volumes and profitability being achieved.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 22 May 2003 it was announced that the proposed transaction whereby
RMBH intended selling its 48.4% interest in GRSA to a consortium backed
by Mettalon Corporation Limited, was terminated due to certain conditions
precedent not being met within the contracted time periods.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSA: Effective interest 9.4% (2002: 9.4%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Absa Group Limited's (Absa) contribution to Remgro's headline earnings was R324 million (2002: R179 million). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Absa's headline earnings for the year ended 31 March 2003 increased
by 82.3% to R3 441 million. This high growth stems from the low earnings
base of the previous financial year which resulted from losses suffered
by its microlending subsidiary, Unifer Holdings Limited (Unifer). Excluding
the impact of Unifer, Absa's headline earnings increased by 19.8%. Commercial
banking showed good advances growth of 11.9%. This performance was primarily
driven by growth in Bankfin's advances. Wholesale domestic advances increased
by 1.7%.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SAGE: Effective interest 16.2% (2002: 16.3%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Effective 31 December 2002, Sage Group Limited's (Sage) financial
year-end was changed from March to December. For the nine months ended
31 December 2002, Sage reported a GAAP headline loss of R48 million
(twelve months ended 31 March 2002: R251 million). Due to the fact that
Remgro's portion of Sage's accumulated losses exceeds its carrying value,
Remgro did not account for its portion of Sage's results for the nine
months ended 31 December 2002. In 2001/2002 Remgro's portion of Sage's
headline loss was R42 million.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On 9 April 2003 Sage announced that the company planned to raise additional capital amounting to R350 million. This will be achieved by an issue of shares to a consortium of investors, represented by, and including, AVASA Holdings Limited, as well as a rights issue to all shareholders of Sage. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Remgro's maximum exposure in terms of the underwriting agreement amounts to R92.5 million. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INDUSTRIAL INTERESTS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contribution to headline earnings:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of headline earnings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The schemes of arrangement in terms of which Industrial Partnership Investments Limited (IPI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Remgro, acquired all the ordinary and preference shares in Hunt Leuchars & Hepburn Holdings Limited (HL&H) not held by it, were sanctioned by the High Court of South Africa on 22 October 2002. The total purchase consideration amounted to R985.6 million. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
During September 2001 it was announced that Robertsons Holdings (Proprietary)
Limited (Robertsons) and Unilever Plc (Unilever) had agreed in principle
to restructure the interests they held in the existing joint venture between
Robertsons and Bestfoods Europe. This was a direct result of Unilever's
acquisition of Bestfoods' global interests.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The new Unilever Bestfoods Robertsons (UBR) venture, in which Robertsons
holds 41%, was established with effect from 1 April 2002. From that date
the interest in UBR has been equity accounted. In the past the interest
in the former Bestfoods Robertsons joint venture was consolidated proportionately.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
UNILEVER BESTFOODS ROBERTSONS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Effective interest 41.0% (2002: 0%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The UBR venture covers the territories of Southern Africa and Israel, and it manufactures and markets an extensive range of food products, enjoying market leadership in most of its major categories. The overriding objectives of the new venture are to deliver above-average, top-line growth and increased value through the realisation of synergies, increased scale and enhanced resources in leading brands, people, experience and innovative capabilities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In South Africa, well-known international and local brands include
Robertsons herbs and spices, Knorr soups, Aromat
seasonings, Skippy, Bovril and Marmite spreads, Rama
and Flora margarine, Melrose cheese, Lipton and Joko
tea, and Mrs Ball's culinary products.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notwithstanding difficult economies in several of the territories
included in the venture, good progress has been made during the first
year of operation. In Israel, trading conditions have become progressively
more difficult due to the escalation of political unrest in the country
and a gradual slowdown of the economy. The Israeli operation has to some
extent managed to offset these difficulties by achieving good growth in
retail sales.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
UBR's contribution to Remgro's headline earnings was R54 million.
The contribution from the former Bestfoods Robertsons joint venture in
2001/2002 was R91 million. These results are however not directly comparable
due to the fact that UBR incurred exceptional restructuring expenses against
its headline earnings during the year under review. Excluding the impact
of these exceptional items, UBR's contribution to Remgro's headline earnings
would have been R106 million.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TSB: Effective interest 100% (2002: 72.4%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Transvaal Sugar Limited (TSB) is primarily involved in cane growing
and the production, transport and marketing of refined and brown sugar
and animal feed. Citrus and tea are also grown on the company's estates.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The primary area of operation is the Nkomazi region in the Mpumalanga
Lowveld. Sugar production operations are situated near Malelane and Komatipoort,
while citrus is grown on TSB's estates in the same region.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Refined and brown sugar products are sold under the Selati brand name, while citrus is being marketed in the overseas markets under the Komati Fruits brand name. Approximately 48% of the sugar production is exported. Other products include Molatek animal feed and Senteeko black tea, which are sold on the local market. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The sugar industry's production increased by 15.3% to 2.75 million tons in 2002/2003, whereas TSB's sugar production increased by 14.6% during the same period. Cane production on TSB's own estates amounted to a best ever 0.85 million tons of cane compared to 0.76 million tons the previous year. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The citrus operations benefited from an aggressive marketing effort,
the return of export prices to normal levels and the normalisation of
export markets. A total of 36.2 thousand tons of oranges and grapefruit
were exported versus 28.5 thousand tons the previous year.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
TSB achieved record results for its 2003 year with headline earnings
of R105.7 million (2002: R72.4 million).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating profit has shown an improvement of R25.6 million or 15.6%.
This marked improvement was mainly contributed to by focused management
attention to productivity enhancements and cost containment, as well as
excellent climatic conditions which resulted in a record sugar production.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Despite increased competition in the national market, TSB was able
to maintain its market share. TSB's contribution to Remgro's headline
earnings was R94 million (2002: R55 million).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RAINBOW: Effective interest 54.5% (2002: 55.7%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rainbow Chicken Limited's (Rainbow) contribution to Remgro's headline
earnings increased from R86 million in the previous year to R152 million
in the period under review.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Its headline earnings grew by 77.9% from R154.7 million to R275.2
million on revenue which, including the impact of volume and mix improvements
in feedmilling, breeding and boiler operations, increased by 23.8%, from
R3.0 billion to R3.8 billion. The significant increase in revenue was
predominantly attributable to the recovery of higher feed raw material
input costs in sales prices.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rainbow reported that its optimisation strategy, although in its early
stages, is progressing as planned and benefits are already beginning to
be realised in terms of both cost efficiencies and better realisations
as a result of an enhanced product mix.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AIR PRODUCTS: Effective interest 50% (2002: 50%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Air Products South Africa (Proprietary) Limited's (Air Products) contribution
to Remgro's headline earnings was R44 million compared to R42 million
in the previous year.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the year under review Air Products continued to experience strong
growth in all the segments in which it operates following the commissioning
of major capital projects the previous year.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DORBYL: Effective interest 42.4% (2002: 42.6%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dorbyl Limited's (Dorbyl) contribution to Remgro's headline earnings
was R41 million (2002: R47 million). This contribution excludes special
dividends amounting to R141 million declared by Dorbyl as a result of
its disposal programme set out hereunder.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
During the past year the core focus of Dorbyl has been considerably
narrowed and to this end a significant number of disposals have been made.
Dorbyl's interest in parts distributor Midas Limited was sold to a management
consortium with effect from 1 June 2002. In addition, Dorbyl Engineering
was sold to a management consortium with a black empowerment partner effective
August/September 2002.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Due to the significant disposals referred to above, Dorbyl's turnover
for the year ended 31 March 2003 declined by 34% to R2.9 billion, while
operating income decreased by 15% to R143.8 million. The continuing operations,
however, reflected significantly higher operating profits for the year
when compared to those of the previous year.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Subsequent to 31 March 2003, Dorbyl disposed of its local Global Roofing
Solutions division.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL SOUTH AFRICA: Effective interest 34.4% (2002: 34.4%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total South Africa (Proprietary) Limited's financial position has
remained sound during its 2002 financial year and its retail market share
continued to grow. Its contribution to Remgro's headline earnings was
R95 million (2002: R92 million).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 30 April 2003 a new economic empowerment grouping, Tosaco (Pty)
Limited (Tosaco), effectively acquired a 25% shareholding of Total South
Africa. This partnership was finalised after negotiations lasting more
than a year. It was structured to ensure a sustainable transaction, compliant
with the Petroleum and Liquid Fuels Charter on empowering historically
disadvantaged South Africans, with specific emphasis on enhancing the
Total South Africa value chain and empowering Tosaco in all aspects thereof
with a strong operational involvement in the South African oil industry.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The three shareholders of Total South Africa prior to the transaction,
which consisted of the French-based oil giant Total, Remgro and Old Mutual,
also played a key role in facilitating this empowerment transaction. Total
France reduced its equity stake to 50.1%, Remgro agreed to dilute its
shareholding from 34.4% to 24.9%, and Old Mutual agreed to sell its 8%
participation back to Total South Africa, thus making it possible for
Tosaco to acquire 25% of Total South Africa's share capital.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MALBAK and NAMPAK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The merger between Malbak Limited (Malbak) and Nampak Limited (Nampak)
was successfully concluded during August 2002. Since then Remgro's interest
in Nampak has been 13.5%.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Malbak's results were equity accounted for the four months to 31 July
2002 and that of the enlarged Nampak for the eight months to 31 March
2003.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NAMPAK: Effective interest 13.5% (2002: 0%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nampak's contribution to Remgro's headline earnings was R88 million.
Together with Malbak's earnings for the first four months, the packaging
interests contributed R131 million for the year under review (2002: R101 million).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the six months ended 31 March 2003 Nampak reported an increase
in headline earnings of 56% to R468.9 million (2002: R301.3 million).
During this period Nampak's divisions achieved overall real volume growth
of approximately 2%. In South Africa the continuation of exports by its
local businesses was a major contributor to this growth.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 7 May 2003 it was announced that Nampak had sold its 51% interest
in NamITech to Allied Technologies Limited for R522.5 million. This transaction
is subject to a number of conditions, including approval of the competition
authorities.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| WISPECO: Effective interest 100% (2002: 100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wispeco Holdings Limited's (Wispeco) contribution to Remgro's headline
earnings was R28 million (2002: R27 million). It should however
be noted that headline earnings for Wispeco's previous financial year
included the creation of a deferred tax asset of R7.5 million (with a
corresponding credit in its income statement), while that of the current
year included a deferred tax expense amounting to R11.4 million.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wispeco's profit before tax grew by 87.3% from R20.8 million to R39.0
million. Overall production efficiencies at Wispeco improved steadily,
contributing towards satisfactory financial results.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MINING INTERESTS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contribution to headline earnings:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of headline earnings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GENCOR: Effective interest 10.9% (2002: 10.9%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gencor Limited's (Gencor) contribution to Remgro's headline earnings
was R223 million (2002: R231 million). These figures relate
to Gencor's twelve months to 31 December 2002.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gencor reported attributable profits of R927 million for the six months
ended 31 December 2002 which was 9.5% lower than the R1 024 million achieved
in the corresponding previous six months. This decrease was mainly due
to the lower income from Impala Platinum Holdings Limited (Impala).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The unbundling of Gencor's interest in Impala by way of a dividend
in specie was approved by Gencor's shareholders on 25 April 2003. Gencor
shareholders received their Impala shares on 18 June 2003. In terms of
the Listings Requirements of the JSE Securities Exchange South Africa,
Gencor's listing will be suspended six months after the proposed unbundling.
Remgro's interest in Impala will be approximately 5.0% and it will no
longer be equity accounted.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TRANS HEX: Effective interest 41.1% (2002: 41.9%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trans Hex Group Limited's (Trans Hex) contribution to Remgro's headline
earnings was R96 million (2002: R75 million).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trans Hex's headline earnings increased by 29.9% from R176.7 million in 2002 to R229.6 million in 2003. Despite challenging world economic conditions, steady rough diamond demand with limited seasonal pricing variations contributed to record diamond sales of $104 million, being an increase of 27% in dollar terms over the previous year. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CORPORATE FINANCE AND OTHER INTERESTS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contribution to headline earnings:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of headline earnings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CORPORATE: Effective interest 100% (2002: 100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The central treasury division's contribution to Remgro's headline
earnings increased from R143 million to R152 million. This was mainly
the result of higher interest rates than the previous year, as well as
higher cash balances during the first half of the financial year.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net corporate costs, including donations, increased by R6 million from R57 million in 2002 to R63 million in 2003. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MEDI-CLINIC: Effective interest 52.4% (2002: 52.3%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Medi-Clinic Corporation Limited's (Medi-Clinic) contribution to Remgro's headline earnings was R191 million (2002: R158 million). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Medi-Clinic's turnover, which consists entirely of hospital fees levied,
increased by 20% to R2 924 million (2002: R2 438 million), while
headline earnings increased by 18% to R366 million (2002: R309 million)
during the year under review.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 1 December 2002 Medi-Clinic, in conjunction with Nozala Investments
(Proprietary) Limited, Mvelaphanda Capital (Proprietary) Limited and Utlwanang
Holdings (Proprietary) Limited (a consortium of black medical professionals),
acquired the Curamed Group (Curamed). Curamed is a group of six Pretoria-based
specialist hospitals comprising approximately 700 beds of which about
150 were commissioned in early June 2003. Medi-Clinic financed its black
economic empowerment partners in this transaction on commercial terms
to the amount of R49 million, pending external finance being granted.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In addition to the 9 million shares acquired during its previous financial year, Medi-Clinic acquired a further 2 million of its own shares during the year under review. These shares will be held in treasury and a total of 1 689 600 shares have already been utilised in terms of its share option scheme. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To all of those who contributed to the performance of the Group over
the past year, we extend our sincere thanks: to the shareholders for their
continued confidence; the managing directors and all colleagues in the
various Group companies for their co-operation and support; all other
directors, officials and employees for their dedication; and all parties
concerned for services rendered.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In particular, we express our gratitude to Mr P J Erasmus who retired
from the Board on 28 August 2002, for his valuable contribution over more
than 45 years.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||